Petitioner claimed seniority and regular pay scale citing previous court decision. Court directed respondents to verify facts and decide within 60 days if petitioner is similarly placed.
Respondents directed to verify facts within 60 days and decide on petitioner's representation regarding seniority and pay scale.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 6994 of 2018
Dharmesh Chandra Baiswade S/o Late Shri Hannu Ram Baiswade, Aged About 55 Years, Posted As Sub Engineer, Public Works Department, Division Mungeli, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh.
---Petitioner
Versus
---Respondents
For petitioner : Shri Anup Majumdar, Advocate. For State : Shri Dheeraj Wankhede, GA.
Hon ' ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board
25/10/2018
2
Singh (supra) and thereafter take an appropriate decision on the representation of the petitioner. Let this exercise be completed within a
period of 60 days from the date of presentation of the order passed by this
Court.
Sd/-
(P. Sam Koshy)
JUDGE
Sumit
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to grant of seniority and regular pay scale from the date of his initial appointment in light of Gokaran Singh judgment.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gokaran Singh Vs. State of ChhattisgarhReferred¶17
Gokaran Singh Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others passed in WPS No. 6710/2014
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dharmesh Chandra Baiswade
State of Chhattisgarh
Engineer-in-Chief
Executive Engineer
P. Sam Koshy
Sumit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
