A writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because the challengeable order had been withdrawn by the State Government before the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WRIT PETITION (S) NO. 604 OF 2018
D.S. Dhruw, S/o Late Beer Singh Dhruw, aged about 47 years, presently posted as Principal, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Barsur, District South Bastar Dantewada (C.G.)
… Petitioner
versus
… Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Kishore Narayan, Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. Syed Majid Ali, Panel Lawyer.
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy
Order on Board
08/02/2018
1. Learned Counsel for the Respondents submits that the order under challenge in the present writ petition has since been withdrawn by the State Government vide order dated 25.1.2018 and a copy of the said order showing withdrawal has also been produced before this Court.
2. In view the same, the present writ petition has become infructuous and the same is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/-
/sharad/ Judge
D.S. Dhruw
State of Chhattisgarh
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
