This motor accident claim appeal considers the appellant's claim of non-ownership. The High Court rejected the appeal, finding the Tribunal correct in concluding the appellant was the actual owner based on auction documents and evidence.
No relief granted; appeal rejected as statement of facts showing appellant is the actual owner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Misc. Appeal (C) No. 541 of 2011
Mewalal Shiv Kumar Jaiswal, R/o near Narendra Talkies, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (CG).
---- Appellant
Versus
---- Respondents
For Appellant-Owner : Shri Subhash Yadav, Advocate.
SB: Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy
Judgment On Board
08.02.2018
2
Jagdalpur, in Claim Case No. 247 of 2009. Vide the said impugned award, the Tribunal in a death case has awarded a compensation of Rs.3,34,560/- along with interest @ 6 percent per annum from the date of application.
3
Rs.25,000/- by way of Bank Draft for the purchase of four vehicles which included the vehicle involved in the present case i.e. MP-021814 (Re-numbered as CG-02-J-2226). It is also reflected from the proceedings that document Annexure C-32 is a document prepared by the present appellant for the purpose of taking possession of the said vehicle after the auction was complete.
Sd/(P. Sam Koshy) Judge
Bhola
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant is the actual owner of the vehicle involved in the accident despite contention of prior purchase by Abdul Shamim.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mewalal Shiv Kumar Jaiswal
Smt. Jagri
Ku. Munni
Urmila
Pramila
Sukhnath
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
