Disposed

Miss Alice Stella Kujur v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC2 Aug 2018WPS/4945/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged non-grant of increment due to lack of B.Ed/D.Ed qualification. Court disposed of the petition by directing respondents to examine the claim under prior orders in Jayant Kumar Patle and Laxmaneshwar Giri Goswami cases.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to examine petitioner's claim for increment in terms of order dated 03-11-2017 in Jayant Kumar Patle case.

Miss Alice Stella Kujur Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

WPS No. 4945 of 2018

¶5

Miss Alice Stella Kujur D/o Mr. George Robin Kujur Aged About 37 Years Presently Posted As Teacher ( Panchayat) ( English) At Government Middle School Semriya ( Bhaiso ) Block Pamgarh District Janjgir Champa R/o Madhuban Road Dayalband , Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

¶6

---- Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi , Bhawan Naya Raipur , Raipur Chhattisgarh.

¶9

Commissioner Cum Director Directorate Of Panchayat Naya Raipur, Raipur Chhattisgarh.

¶10

Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Janjgir - Champa District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.

¶11

Block Education Officer Pamgarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.

¶12

---- Respondents

¶13

For the Petitioner : Shri Ashutosh Mishra, Advocate For the State : Shri R.K. Gupta, Dy. A.G.

¶14

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta

¶15

Order On Board

¶16

02/08/2018

¶17

Heard counsel for the parties.

¶18

The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the respondents, whereby the increment is not granted to the petitioner on the ground that she has not passed B. Ed/D. Ed examination.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the issue with regard to withdrawal/non grant of increment on the ground of having not passed B.Ed/D. Ed examination was examined by this Court in the

¶20

¶21

case of Jayant Kumar Patle vs. State of Chhattisgarh (WPS No.4271 of 2017 and batch of petitions, vide order dated 03-11-2017) and also in WPS No. 99/2018 (Laxmaneshwar Giri Goswami -v- State of CG and ors.) and various directions have been issued for affording proper opportunity of hearing and then decide the matter. This case is squarely covered by the above cases and may be disposed of in the light of the directions given in above cases.

¶22

Learned State counsel would submit that the petitioner's claim would be examined after affording opportunity of hearing in terms of order dated 03-11-2017 passed in the case of Jayant Kumar Patle (supra).

¶23

Considering the aforesaid submission, this petition is finally disposed

¶24

off with a direction to the respondents for examination of petitioner's claim in terms of order passed by this Court in the case of Jayant Kumar Patle (supra) and take appropriate decision thereon.

¶25

Sd/-

¶26

(Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge

¶27

Kamde

Miss Alice Stella Kujur v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Miss Alice Stella Kujur v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhagat Das Vs Chief Managing Dirctror,Secl and Ors.

Smt Sumitra Jaiswal Vs State of Cg and Others

Udesh Kumar Bhawani Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Manish Pathak Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Devnarayan Kashyap Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ritesh Kumar Vs State of Chhattisgarh