Petitioners sought to count service from their first appointment as Guruji in 1995. The court held that the conversion order dated 25-6-2005 governed the appointment date, and the writ petition lacked merit, so it did not interfere.
None granted; writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 1694 of 2009
---- Petitioners
Versus
---- Respondents
For petitioners Mr. Harish Khuntiya, Adv. For R-1, 3 and 4/State Mr. R.K. Gupta, Dy. Adv. General For R-2 None.
ORDER ON BOARD
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta
3-8-2018
2
Mission from 1995-96 to 1999. Subsequently, they have been appointed as contract teachers grad-III by the concerned Gram Panchayat. Thereafter the services of the contract teachers grade-III have been converted into the post of Shiksha karmi grade-III by order Annexure P-5 dated 25-6-2005.
Sd/(Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge
pathak
2 issues framed by the court
Whether petitioners were entitled to count their service from the date of initial appointment as Guruji instead of the appointed date as Shiksha Karmi.
Whether the respondents are bound to grant seniority and benefits from the date of first appointment despite the conversion order specifying a later date.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
WPS no. 260/2009 (Smt. Kurdula Kujur and others -v- State of Chhattisgarh and others)Referred¶7
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Chandramani Paikra and others
State Of Chhattisgarh
Sharad Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
