Arrest of the petitioners' son rendered the writ petition redundant; the High Court closed the proceedings without prejudice.
Writ petition closed without prejudice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPHC No. 2 of 2018
---- Petitioners Versus
2
---- Respondents
For Petitioners : Shri Brijesh Singh, Advocate For State : Shri R. K. Gupta, Deputy Advocate General
Hon'ble Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy
Order on Board
Per Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, Chief Justice
01.03.2018
Today the learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that the Petitioners' son
has been arrested by the police and therefore nothing survives in this writ petition.
Hence, this writ petition is closed without prejudice.
Sd/Sd/- (Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan) (P. Sam Koshy) Chief Justice Judge
Chandra
Smt. Teej Kunvar Rathore
Keetab Singh Rathore
State Of Chhattisgarh
Sandeep Sahu
Sanjay Sahu
Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
