The High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking quashing of criminal proceedings. The court held the petition was not a fit case for writ jurisdiction as the petitioner had alternative remedies including police authorities or jurisdictional magistrates.
The petition for quashing of criminal proceedings was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPCR No. 470 of 2018
Hitendra Singh @ Hitu S/o Late Dinesh Kumar Singh Aged About 40 Years R/o Aakash Nagar A-13, Lingiyadih, Police Station Sarkanda Bilaspur, Chhattistarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
For Petitioner : Mr. Rohit Sharma, Advocate For State : Mr. Anand Dadariya, G.A.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Order On Board
19.09.2018
Heard.
Sd/-
(Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge
Rekha
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition for quashing criminal proceedings is maintainable when alternative remedies exist.
Whether the nature of alleged crimes shifts to non-bailable offences justifying high court intervention despite prior rejection of anticipatory bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Hitendra Singh @ Hitu S/o Late Dinesh Kumar Singh
The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Principal Secretary, Home Department
The Superintendent Of Police Bilaspur
Station House Officer Police Station- Sarkanda
Amar Panjwani S/o Dayal Das Panjwani
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
