On an application for withdrawal, the High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the application and dismissed the criminal petition as withdrawn. No substantive legal proposition was laid down.
Application for withdrawal allowed; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRMP No. 493 of 2018
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station Utai, District Durg Chhattigarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh .. Respondent
For Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Thakre, Advocate For State : Ms. M. Asha, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Order On Board
14.09.2018
Heard on I.A. No.3, application for withdrawal of the petition.
Upon due consideration and the prayer made in the application, the application (I.A.No.3) is allowed.
Therefore, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Certified copy of Annexure P/4 may be returned to learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining photocopy of the same.
Sd/-
(Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge
Rekha
Mordhwaj Verma and 4 others
State Of Chhattisgarh
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
