The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition filed by two petitioners against the State and other excise officials, holding that the petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Writ Petition (C) No. 731 of 2014
----Petitioners
Versus
---- Respondents.
For Petitioner : Shri Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate. For State : Shri Arun Sao, Dy. Advocate General. For Respondent No. 5 : Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
18/07/2018
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
D/-
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition had become infructuous due to the passage of time.
Awadhram Dewangan
Shivnanad Yadav
State of Chhattisgarh
Collector, Kabirdham
Commissioner, Excise
Superintendent of Police, Kabirdham
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
