This High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the order of the State Information Commission. The court found no illegality or perversity in the finding that the desired information had already been supplied to the petitioner in a complete form, thus rejecting the petitioner's claim for additional information.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPC No. 1443 of 2012
Smt. Sarita Halwai, Aged About 48 Years, W/o Shri Prem Lal Halwai, Occupation – Housewife, (Terminated Employee As Anganbadi Karykarta), R/o Bharrapara, Pendra, P.S. And Tahsil Pendra Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Vishwanath Goswami, Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. Arun Sao, Dy. A. G. and Mr. Avinash Singh, Panel Lawyer.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
17/07/18
2
information has not been supplied and incomplete information has been provided to him therefore, the order of State Information Commission deserves to be set aside and the Public Information Officer be directed to supply additional information.
SD/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
Priyanka
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the information sought had already been supplied to the petitioner as found by the State Information Commission, making the writ petition maintainable.
Smt. Sarita Halwai
State Information Commission
Sub Divisional Officer (Rev).
Public Information Officer/chief Municipal Officer Pendra
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
