Dismissed

Master Gagandeep Singh Gill Minor v. Bank of India

Chhattisgarh HC1 Mar 2018WPC/445/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by petitioners challenging proceedings by Respondent Bank. Counsel for Bank stated proceedings under SARFAESI Act were withdrawn. Court held no cause of action survived and dismissed the petition.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as having no cause of action; liberty granted to respondent Bank to proceed further.

Master Gagandeep Singh Gill Minor Vs Bank of India — Banking and Recovery | Chhattisgarh HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

Writ Petition (C) No. 445 of 2018

¶5

Master Gagandeep Singh Gill Minor S/o Amarjeet Singh Gill Aged About 7 Years Through Father And Natural Guardian R/o H.No. 148, Housing Board Colony, Ward No. 15, Kumhari District Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh

¶6

Smt. Paramjeet Kaur, W/o Late Jaspal Singh Gill, Aged About 58 Years R/o Khalsa Dhaba, Limtara Tigadda, Post Bisrampur, District Baloda Bazar, Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

¶7

Shri Rajendra Singh Gill S/o Lt. Jaspal Singh Gill, Aged About 28 Years R/o Khalsa Dhaba, Limtara Tigadda, Post Bisrampur, District Baloda Bazar, Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

¶8

Shri Arya Singh Gill S/o Late Jaspal Singh Gill, Aged About 27 Years R/o Khalsa Dhaba, Limtara Tigadda, Post Bisrampur, District Baloda Bazar, Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

¶9

Ms. Poonam Gill D/o Late Jaspal Singh Gill, Aged About 23 Years R/o Khalsa Dhaba, Limtara Tigadda, Post Bisrampur, District Baloda Bazar, Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

¶10

---- Petitioners

¶11

Versus

¶12

Bank Of India Through Authorized Officer, Regional Office, Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶13

District Magistrate, Durg, Office Of Collector, Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh

¶14

----Respondents

¶15

For Petitioners : Mr. Basant Kaiwartya, Advocate. For Respondents/State : Mr. Ashish Surana, Panel Lawyer. For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Anand Shukla, Advocate

¶16

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

¶17

Order On Board

¶18

01/03/18

¶19

Learned counsel appearing for respondent - Bank of India submit that proceeding initiated under the SARFAESI Act, 2002 has already been

¶20

¶21

withdrawn against the petitioners, therefore, no cause of action survives for consideration.

¶22

The statement of Mr. Shukla is placed on record.

¶23

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having no cause of action. However, the respondent Bank will be at liberty to proceed further in accordance with law.

¶24

Sd/-

¶25

(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge

¶26

Priyanka

Master Gagandeep Singh Gill Minor v. Bank of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Master Gagandeep Singh Gill Minor v. Bank of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Bilquis Khana Vs The New India Assurance Company Limited

Abhishek Kumar Parganiha Vs Union Of India

Yashwant Kumar Hota Vs State of Chhattisgarh

M/S Vijay Kumar Garg Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ramsagar Rai Vs Municipal Corporation Of Raipur

Daljit Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh