Petitioner sought representation to the bank regarding NPA classification, unpaid title deed return, and interest demand under Master Circular 1.7.2009. Court allowed representation within two weeks for bank decision within four weeks.
Petitioner permitted to make representation; Bank directed to decide within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Writ Petition (C) No. 306 of 2013
Nitesh Kumar Verma, Proprietor M/s Global Electronics World, S/o Shri Pradeep Kumar Verma, Aged about 36 years, Police Station – Tarbahar, R/o A-33, Vinoba Nagar, Bilaspur (C.G.)
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Sachin Tamrakar, Advocate. . For Respondents : Mr. Sachin Singh Rajput, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
11/07/2018
2
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
D/-
3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to make a representation to the bank for redressal of grievances regarding NPA classification, interest demand, and withholding of title deed.
Whether interest is payable by the petitioner as per clause 3.1.1 of the Master Circular dated 1.7.2009.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nitesh Kumar Verma
Punjab National Bank
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
