Petitioners' counsel submitted that the writ petition was moot due to return filed by respondents. The High Court disposed of the writ petition on this basis without further analysis.
Writ petition finally disposed of on submission that nothing survives after respondent's return.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Writ Petition (C) No. 1591 of 2012
----Petitioners
Versus
2
---- Respondents.
For Petitioners : Shri Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate.
For State : Shri Avinash Singh, Panel Lawyer.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
11/07/2018
(1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition in light of return filed by the respondents.
(2) In view of submission made by counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
D/-
3
Dhruva Karmakar
Subendu Wiswas
Tanu Das
State of Chhattisgarh
Collector, Raipur
Tahsildar, Raipur
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
