Petitioners challenged a notice to demolish their house for road widening, arguing lack of decision on compensation. The High Court directed the Municipal Corporation to decide the compensation claim within one month and disposed of the writ petition.
Respondent directed to consider and decide the petitioners' case for compensation within one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPC No. 168 of 2018
---- Petitioners
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioners : Mr. Manoj Kumar Jaiswal, Advocate. For State : Mr. Shashank Thakur, G.A. For Respondents : Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
06/03/18
2
period of one month from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order.
of. No order as to cost(s).
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
Priyanka
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Municipal Corporation must consider and decide the petitioners' claim for compensation within one month.
Whether the notice to demolish the house for road widening required adjudication on compensation.
Santosh Sahu
Kirti Sahu
Municipal Corporation, Raipur
Zone Commissioner, Zone No. 7, Nagar Palik Nigam Raipur Chhattisgarh
The State Of Chhattisgarh Through District Collector, Raipur Chhattisgarh
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
