This is an order on board on a writ petition challenging jurisdiction of notices. The court directed the respondent to decide the objection expeditiously within two weeks and dismissed the writ petition without deciding the merits.
Directed respondent to decide the objection filed by the petitioner within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Writ Petition (C) No. 1193 of 2012
Anil Shrivastava, S/o Late Shri Hriday Narayan Shrivastava, aged about 42 years, R/o-Ring Road, Kedarpur, Police Station & Tahsil – Ambikapur, Distt. Sarguja (C.G.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Chhattisgarh Rajya Anusuchit Janjati Ayog Raipur (C.G.), Through – its Secretary, Chhattisgarh Rajya Anusuchit Janjati Ayog, Raipur (C.G.)
---- Respondents
For Petitioners : Shri Arvind Sinha, Advocate. For Respondent No.1 : Shri B.L. Sahu, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
02/08/2018
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
D/-
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether notices issued by respondent No.1 are without jurisdiction and can be expedited.
Anil Shrivastava
Chhattisgarh Rajya Anusuchit Janjati Ayog Raipur (C.G.)
Shri Goverdhan Singh
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
