Allowed

Karan Kumar Suryavanshi and Anr. v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC28 Sept 2018MCRC/6507/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the bail application of two applicants under Section 439 CrPC in connection with offences under Sections 294, 323, 307, 506, 34 IPC. They were directed to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 20,000 with one surety each to each applicant.

What did the court decide?

Release of the applicants on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 20,000/- each with one surety each in the like sum.

Karan Kumar Suryavanshi and Anr. Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Bail and Remand | Chhattisgarh HC (2018)

¶1

NAFR

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶3

MCRC No. 6507 of 2018

¶4

Karan Kumar Suryavanshi And Anr. S/o Shri Deepak Kumar Suryavanshi Aged About 22 Years R/o- Naharpara, P.S.- Seepat, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.,

¶5

Ompraksah Khare S/o Shri Santosh Kumar Khare Aged About 24 Years R/o- Naharpara, P.S.- Seepat, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.,

¶6

---- Applicants

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Chhattisgarh Through- P.S.- Seepat, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶9

---- Respondent

¶10

For Applicants : Shri Sourabh Sharma, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Ashish Shukla, Dy.AG

¶11

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey

¶12

Order On Board

¶13

28/09/2018

¶14

The applicants have filed this application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail as they are in custody in connection with Crime No. 115/2018 registered at police station Seepat District Bilaspur (CG) for the offence punishable under Sections 294,323,307,506,34 IPC.

¶15

As per prosecution case, on the date of incident, there was some quarrel between the complainant and the applicants in which the applicants assaulted and threatened him of life.

¶16

Counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and they have been falsely implicated. He submits that the applicants are in jail since 26.05.18 and the trial will take time for final disposal and therefore they may be released on bail.

¶17

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application.

¶18

Considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, in particular the nature of allegations against the applicants, I am inclined to release them on bail. Accordingly, their application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is allowed.

¶19

It is directed that in the event of the applicants' furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 20,000/- with one surety each in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned court for their appearance before it as and when directed, they shall be released on bail.

¶20

Sd/(Rajani Dubey) Judge

¶21

suguna

Karan Kumar Suryavanshi and Anr. v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karan Kumar Suryavanshi and Anr. v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahipal Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Manoranjan Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Shiva Singh & Anr. Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Rahul Soni Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Sonu Sahu and Anr. Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Luckky @ Sonu Sharma and Anr. Vs State of Chhattisgarh