Allowed

Sonu Sahu and Anr. v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC28 Sept 2018MCRC/6544/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Single Judge Order considers a bail application filed by two accused persons in connection with a theft case punishable under Sections 380, 457/34 IPC. The High Court allowed the bail application, directing furnishing of a personal bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

The application under Section 439 CrPC is allowed. Applicants to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 20,000/- with one surety each in the like sum.

Sonu Sahu and Anr. Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Bail and Remand | Chhattisgarh HC (2018)

¶1

NAFR

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶3

MCRC No. 6544 of 2018

¶4

Sonu Sahu, S/o Bhole Prasad Sahu Aged About 19 Years R/oVillage Gandhi, Police Station Kotma, District- Anuppur, Madhya Pradesh.,

¶5

Luckky @ Sonu Sharma S/o Balkrishna Sharma Aged About 25 Years R/o- Mani Mohalla, Chainpur, Police Station And Tahsil Manendragarh, District- Korea, Chhattisgarh.,

¶6

---- Applicants

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Chhattisgarh Through-The Station House Officer, Police Of Police Station- Manendragarh, District- Korea, Chhattisgarh.,

¶9

---- Respondent

¶10

For Applicants : Shri Anil Gulati, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Ashish Shukla, Dy.AG

¶11

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey

¶12

Order On Board

¶13

28/09/2018

¶14

The applicants have filed this application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail as they are in custody in connection with Crime No. 85/2018 registered at police station Manendragarh, District Koriya (CG) for the offence punishable under Sections 380 & 457/34 IPC.

¶15

As per prosecution case, report was lodged by the complainant that the applicants after breaking open the lock, had committed theft of gold and silver ornaments and cash of Rs. 15,000/- kept in the almirah.

¶16

Counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent

¶17

and they have been falsely implicated. He submits that the applicants are in jail since 02.04.18 and the trial will take time for final disposal and therefore they may be released on bail.

¶18

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application.

¶19

Considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, in particular the nature of allegations against the applicants, I am inclined to release them on bail. Accordingly, their application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is allowed.

¶20

It is directed that in the event of the applicants' furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 20,000/- with one surety each in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned court for their appearance before it as and when directed, they shall be released on bail.

¶21

Sd/-

¶22

(Rajani Dubey) Judge

¶23

suguna

Sonu Sahu and Anr. v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sonu Sahu and Anr. v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahipal Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Manoranjan Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Shiva Singh & Anr. Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Rahul Soni Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Luckky @ Sonu Sharma and Anr. Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ravi Pandey Vs State of Chhattisgarh