The applicants bail petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as no representation appeared before the court despite repeated calls.
The bail petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 6090 of 2018
----Applicant
Versus
---- Non-applicant
For Applicant : None. For Non-applicant : Shri Ashok Swarnkar, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order on Board
06.10.2018
want of prosecution.
Sd/-
(Sharad Kumar Gupta) JUDGE
kishore
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail petition has been prosecuted given the absence of representation on its behalf.
Agnikant Burman @ Vickky
State Of Chhattisgarh
Sharad Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
