This court dismissed the bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., as counsel for the applicant informed the bench that they had no further instructions, resulting in a dismissal for want of prosecution.
The bail application was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
M.CR.C. No. 5904 of 2017
Mohd. Shabir Ali, S/o. Rasul Shah, Aged About 36 Years, R/o. Near MGM School, Vaishali Nagar, Bhilai, Police Station -Supela, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh.
---- Applicant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Station House Officer, Police Station - Supela, District – Durg, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent
| 09/01/2018 | Mr. Amiyakant Tiwari, counsel for the applicant. |
|---|---|
| Mr. Vinod Tekam, P.L. for the State/respondent. Heard. |
|
| Learned counsel for the applicant pleads no instruction, accordingly, the instant bail application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution. |
|
| Sd/- (Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge |
balram
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the bail application should be dismissed for want of prosecution after the applicant pleaded no instruction.
Whether the instant bail application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. is maintainable in the absence of instructions.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohd. Shabir Ali
State of Chhattisgarh
Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
