and Manoranjan Kumar Pandey, on the basis of which the trial Court allowed the application for compounding the offence under Section 320 of the Cr.P.C. and acquitted applicant Anurag Singh and Manoranjan Kumar Pandey from the charges under Section 420 of the IPC. Jyoti Shah, the Director of Yogesh Udyog Pvt. Ltd. has given statement before the Court that she does not want to prosecute applicants Anurag Singh and Manoranjan Kumar Pandey. Hence, looking to these developments of circumstances, it is prayed that the applicant may be granted regular bail. 4 . Learned counsel for applicant S. Gopal Krishna in MCRCA No.596/2017 submits that the applicant is apprehending his arrest in this case. It is submitted that between date 31-12-2015 and 19-01-2016 the amount of Rs.3,65,00,000/- was transferred from the account of Yogesh Udyog Pvt. Ltd. to the account of Sai Industries. This transfer was made by applicant Anurag Singh in personal capacity without the instructions of the superior authorities of the bank, which he has admitted in his letter dated 28-01-2016 attached as Annexure-A/5. The loss incurred to Yogesh Udyog Pvt. Ltd. has been reimbursed and email was received from the Director of Yogesh Udyog Pvt. Ltd. On 29-01-2016 that after receiving the deposits, it intends to withdraw the complaint. It is submitted that there is no mens rea was there on the part of the applicant. The applicant in capacity of the Manager of the said bank has accepted the responsibility regarding illegal transaction made by the subordinate staff. A compromise entered into by the complainant and other accused persons is equally applicable to this applicant. Further, no case will be left to be determined in view of the ratio laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the matter of CBI, ACB, Mumbai V. Narendra Lal Jain and Ors. , reported in AIR 2014 SC (Supp) 532 and by Bombay High Court in the matter State v.
