The High Court allowed the bail application of two applicants accused of abducting minors for Goa. The court found no likelihood of absconding or evidence tampering and directed release on bail with a solvent surety and personal bond.
Bail allowed by furnishing one solvent surety for Rs. 25,000/- and personal bond of similar amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 5391 of 2018
---- Applicants
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, through Station House Officer, Police Station Gharghoda, District Raigarh (CG).
---- Non-applicant
For Applicants : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Behra, Advocate. For Non-applicant : Mr. Sumit Jhanwar, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta
Order On Board
22.10.2018
2
implicated in the present case, therefore, they may be released on bail. 5. On the other hand, counsel for the State opposes the prayer for grant of bail to the applicants.
(Sharad Kumar Gupta) JUDGE
L/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicants should be granted bail in a case involving child abduction under IPC Sections 363 and 370.
Whether the likelihood of absconding or tampering with evidence justifies refusing bail.
4 provisions across 3 enactments
Vinod Bhagat
Shiv Prasad Chouhan
State of Chhattisgarh
Sharad Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
