Bail application dismissed as withdrawn by the applicant without consideration of merits, subject to liberty to examine seizure witnesses.
None granted; instance dismissed by the applicant. Liberty to examine seizure witnesses.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 5409 of 2018
Ramanad S/o Nageshwar Choudhary Aged About 50 Years R/oVillage Turkaha, Thana And District- Gopalganj, (Bihar), District : Gopalganj, Bihar.
---- Applicant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Station House Officer, Police StationBasna, District- Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh., District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent
For the Applicant : Shri Vikas Pradhan, Advocate For the State : Shri Satish Guta, Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta
Order On Board
12/10/2018
Sd/-
(Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge
Kamde
Ramanad S/o Nageshwar Choudhary
State Of Chhattisgarh
Sharad Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
