In a first bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the prayer for bail in a case involving 18.453 kg of cannabis, citing the large quantity, seriousness of the offence, and adverse impact on society.
Bail application is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 3701 of 2018
Khitesh @ Khitish Mandal, S/o Shri Karndhar Mandal, aged about 43 years, R/o M.B.97, Post Pedankonda, P.S. Malkhangiri, District Malkhangiri (Orissa).
---- Applicant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, through Police Station Kanker, District North Bastar Kanker (CG).
---- Non-applicant
For Applicant : Mr. C.R. Sahu, Advocate For Non-applicant : Ms. Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta
Order On Board
19.09.2018
2
Sd/-
(Sharad Kumar Gupta) JUDGE
L/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant who was apprehended with a large quantity of cannabis under Section 20(B) of the NDPS Act.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Khitesh @ Khitish Mandal
Sharad Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
