Allowed

Raju @ Rai Singh v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC19 Sept 2018MCRC/2712/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed a first bail application under Section 439 CrPC for an applicant accused of offences under IPC and POCSO. The court granted bail contingent upon the furnishing of a solvent surety for Rs. 25,000 and a personal bond. The applicant is to appear before the trial court as directed.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted subject to furnishing one solvent surety of Rs. 25,000 with a personal bond of the like amount.

Raju @ Rai Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Chhattisgarh HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

MCRC No. 2712 of 2018

¶5

Raju @ Rai Singh S/o Umendra Singh Gond Aged About 21 Years R/o Shivpur ( Batpara), Tahsil And Police Station Khargawa, District Koriya Chhattisgarh.

¶6

---- Applicant

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Khargawa, District Koriya Chhattisgarh.

¶9

---- Respondent

¶10

For the Applicant : Shri P.M. Shrivas, Advocate For the State : Shri Vinod Tekam, Panel Lawyer

¶11

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta

¶12

Order On Board

¶13

19/09/2018

¶14

This is the first bail application under Section 439 of the CrPC and there is no bail application is pending before any other Court.

¶15

Perused the case diary provided by the counsel for the State in connection with the Crime No. 60/2017 registered at Police Station Khargawa, District Koriya (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 363, 366, 376(2)(j), 506(ii) of IPC and 4,6 & 10 of POCSO Act.

¶16

Case of the prosecution, in brief is that on 14/04/2017 age of the prosecutrix was 16 years and 3 months. She is resident of village Bardar. Prosecutrix and applicant were phoned to each other. Applicant had expressed that he is in love with her. On 14/04/2017 in late hour she had left to outdoor for the toilet. Applicant and one another person caught hold her and taken away towards nullah. Applicant committed sexual intercourse with her. Thereafter applicant had told her to go in her house, then she told that she will go along with him. Applicant ran away then prosecutrix followed him.

¶17

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and

¶18

¶19

falsely implicated in the present case, therefore, he shall be released on bail.

¶20

On the other hand, counsel for the State opposes the bail application. He further submits that there is no antecedents of the applicant.

¶21

Looking to the above mentioned facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to give the benefit of Section 439 of Cr.P.C. to the present applicant.

¶22

Consequently, the bail application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C., is allowed. It is directed that if the applicant furnishes one solvent surety for a sum of Rs. 25,000/- along with a personal bond in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Court with the condition that he shall appear before the trial Court at 11.00 am as and when directed till trial and he would cooperate during the trial, he shall be released on bail.

¶23

Certified copy as per rules.

¶24

Sd/- - (Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge

¶25

Kamde

Raju @ Rai Singh v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raju @ Rai Singh v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kapil Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Sanju Kumar Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Rahul Khatik & Anr. Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Khitesh @ Khitish Mandal Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Vijay Kerketta Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Mahesh Prajapati Vs State of Chhattisgarh