High Court allowed applicant's bail application in IPC 307 case where main eyewitness was not appearing, causing trial delay. Court directed release on personal bond of Rs.25,000 with one surety.
Applicant released on regular bail on furnishing personal bond of Rs.25,000 with one surety in like sum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 3115 of 2018
---- Applicant
Versus
---- Respondent
For Applicants : Mr. Arun Kochar, Advocate For State/respondent : Mr. Ashok Swarnkar, P.L.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant Order On Board
16/07/2018
2
offence punishable under Section 307/34 & 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3
Sd/-
(Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge
Nisha
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant entitled to regular bail considering delay in trial due to main witness absence.
Whether false implication of the applicant warrants release on bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kamal Kishore
State Of Chhattisgarh
Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
