Appellants informed the court they had completed their sentences and left jail, stating they did not wish to pursue the appeal. The court disposed of the appeal accordingly.
The appeal is disposed off as the appellant does not wish to prosecute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
CR.A. No. 519 of 2006
Ram Avtar Prajapati & Anr. Vs. State of C.G.
| 13/07/2018 | Mr. Arun Shukla, counsel for the appellants. |
|---|---|
| balram | Mr. Ashok Kumar Swarnakar, Panel Lawyer for the State. Heard. Counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants have completed their sentences and they have been released from jail. Hence, the appellants does not wish to prosecute this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed off. Sd/- (Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge |
Ram Avtar Prajapati & Anr.
State of C.G.
Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
