The appellate court had no representation from the appellant when the matter was called. The court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution as no steps were taken by the party.
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCC No. 829 of 2013
---- Appellant
Versus
---- Respondent
For the Appellant :- None for the appellant. For the respondent :- None for the respondent.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vimla Singh Kapoor,
Order on Board By
Prashant Kumar Mishra, J.
07.12.2018
Sd/Sd/-
Judge
Judge Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra Vimla Singh Kapoor
PAWAN
Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle -1 (1) Raipur
Smt. Lata Agrawal
Prashant Kumar Mishra
Vimla Singh Kapoor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
