Disposed
Mrinal Mallik v. Jagannath Dey
Chhattisgarh HCFAM/118/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR FAM No. 118 of 2017…
What the court decided
AI extract
CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR FAM No. 118 of 2017…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
AFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
FAM No. 118 of 2017
---- Petitioner
Versus
All are R/o Sector-2, Timber Colony, Raurkela, District Sundergarh Odisha
---- Respondent
For Appellant Sunil Sahu, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vimla Singh Kapoor
Judgment On Board
By
Prashant Kumar Mishra J.
07/12/2018
2
“29..... In any event, if a second suit was maintainable in terms of Order 2 Rule 4 of the Code, as was submitted by Ms Luthra, no leave was required to be granted therefor. A civil court does not grant leave to file another suit. If the law permits, the plaintiff may file another suit but not on the basis of observations made by a superior court.
suit, which is otherwise maintainable, no leave of the Court is necessary.
Sd/Sd/Judge Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra Vimla Singh Kapoor
Gowri
Mrinal Mallik
Jagannath Dey
Smt. Meena Dey
Prashant Kumar Mishra
Vimla Singh Kapoor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court