The High Court of Chhattisgarth allowed an application condoning a 68-day delay in filing a restoration application. The court subsequently restored a First Appeal solely dismissed for want of prosecution, finding the applicant's absence justified.
IA No. 1 allowed; First Appeal (M) No. 181 of 2016 restored.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCC No. 566 of 2018
Smt. Vandita Kesharwani W/o Shri Arvind Keshrwani, Aged About 33 Years D/o Shri Jugal Keshawani, Aged About 33 Years , R/o Shivrinarayan Police Station Shivrinarayan District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.
---- Applicant
Versus
Shri Arvind Kesharwani S/o Omprakash Keshawani, Aged About 35 Years R/o Lavan Road Baloda Bazar, District BalodabazarBhatapara, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent
For the Applicant
: Shri Preetam Tiwari, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta
Order On Board
09/08/2018
Sd/-
(Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge
Kamde
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an application for condonation of delay in filing a restoration application is allowed when reasons are just and sufficient.
Whether an application for restoration of a First Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution is allowed when the absence of the applicant at the date of dismissal is justified.
Smt. Vandita Kesharwani W/o Shri Arvind Keshrwani
Shri Arvind Kesharwani
Sharad Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
