The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed a First Appeal for want of prosecution as the appellant failed to make any representation during the second call date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
F.A. No. 50 of 2004
Smt. Vedanti @ Smt. Seema, aged 26 years, W/o Vishnu @ Udhisthir Dubey, (D/o K.P. Upadhyay) Lal Bagicha, Dhamtari, Tahsil & Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.)
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For the Petitioner : None For the Respondents : None
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta
Order On Board
06/08/2018
Sd/-
(Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge
Kamde
Smt. Vedanti @ Smt. Seema
Vishnu @ Udhisthir
K.P. Upadhyay
Sharad Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
