The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the present appeal by doctors协会会长 for lack of prosecution as none appeared nor filed representation despite multiple hearing dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
FA No. 48 of 2003
Hanuman Prasad Rajak & Anr. Vs. State of MP & Anr.
| 16/03/2018 | None for the appellants. The matter was called on for hearing three days continuously. Despite being called on three days continuously, none appearing nor any representation is made on behalf of the appellants. In view of the above, this court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. |
|---|---|
| Sd/- | |
| (P. Sam Koshy) Judge |
Inder
Hanuman Prasad Rajak & Anr.
State of MP & Anr.
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
