Allowed

Smt. Sonkunwar Pandey v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC15 Mar 2018WPS/1678/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed the petitioner's prayer for correction in name and disposed of the Writ Petition by directing the respondent to settle the deceased husband's retirement and death benefits claim within 60 days, with 10% interest awarded for the delay.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.3 to decide and settle claim within 60 days; 10% interest on delayed benefits.

Smt. Sonkunwar Pandey Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶4

WPS No. 1678 of 2018

¶5

Smt. Sonkunwar W/o late Shri Sabal Singh, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Village Bakalo, Police Station Premnagar, Tahsil Premnagar, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh.

¶6

---Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

¶9

The Deputy Director, Panchayat And Social Welfare Department, Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh.

¶10

The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Katghora, District Korba Chhattisgarh.

¶11

The Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts And Pension, Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh.

¶12

---Respondents

¶13

For petitioner : Shri R.K.Mishra, Advocate. For State : Shri Shashank Thakur, Government Advocate.

¶14

Hon ' ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board

¶15

15/03/2018

¶16

An oral request has been made by the counsel for the petitioner for

¶17

carrying out the necessary correction in the name of the petitioner wherein

¶18

instead of Singh, Pandey has been erroneously typed.

¶19

Prayer is allowed.

¶20

Let necessary correction be carried out during the course of the day itself.

¶21

¶22

The relief sought for by the petitioner in the present Writ Petition is the direction to the respondents for release of death-cum-retiral benefits, G.P.F. and other monetary benefits which the petitioner would be entitled on the death of her husband who was working as a Sahayak Antrik Lekha Parikshan Avam Kararopan Adhikari under the respondent No.3.

¶23

The contention of the counsel for the petitioner is that, the husband of the petitioner had died in harness on 07/09/2011, but though seven years have passed till date, the respondents have not released the benefits which has accrued to her on the death of her husband.

¶24

The record also show that there is already a recommendation made by the Chief Executive Officer and the matter has been sent to the office of Deputy Director, Panchayat and Social Welfare Department.

¶25

Thus, this Court is of the opinion that no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the Writ Petition pending.

¶26

Accordingly, the same is disposed off with a direction to the respondent No.3 to ensure that the claim of the petitioner is decided and settled within a period of 60 days from today.

¶27

The petitioner shall also be entitled for interest on the delayed retiral benefits @ 10% as it is more than 7 years that the death of the deceased employee and till date there does not seem to have been any progress in the settling of the dues to the widow of the deceased.

¶28

¶29

The office of the Deputy Director, Panchayat would ensure that the interest part would be recovered from the erring officer who had not processed the case of the petitioner promptly.

¶30

The Writ Petition accordingly stands allowed and disposed off.

Sd/-

(P. Sam Koshy)

JUDGE

Sumit

Smt. Sonkunwar Pandey v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Sonkunwar Pandey v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Kanti Devi Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Smt. Vimla Bai Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Pratibha Chandrkar Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Rajesh Kumar & Anr. Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Dr. Sujeet Kumar Mishra Vs Guru Ghashidas Central University Bilaspur

Niyazuddin Khan Vs State of Chhattisgarh