The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Criminal Revision No. 590 of 2002 as having become infructuous based on counsel's submission without further elaboration in the provided text.
Criminal revision dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Criminal Revision No. 590 of 2002
State of Chhattisgarh, through Special Police Establishment, Lokayukta, Raipur (CG).
---- Applicant
Versus
Sheelbhadra Jatav, S/o Badrilal, Sub Divisional Forest Officer Kawardha (CG).
--- Non-applicant
For Applicant/State : Mr. Suryakant Mishra, Panel Lawyer For Non-applicant : Mr. Aman Kesharwani, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board
10/10/2018
(1) Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that the instant criminal revision has become infructuous.
(2) Accordingly, the criminal revision is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/-
(Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge
L/-
State of Chhattisgarh, through Special Police Establishment, Lokayukta, Raipur (CG)
Sheelbhadra Jatav
Sharad Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
