The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected a bail application under Section 439 CrPC. The court held that given the seriousness of the offences involving IPC sections 363, 366, 376 and POCSO Act Section 4, along with potential social impact, bail was not warranted.
The bail application was rejected and the applicant was not granted bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 4868 of 2018
---- Applicant
Versus
---- Non-applicant
For Applicants : Shri Anil Gulati, Advocate. For Non-applicant : Shri Sumit Jhanwar, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta
Order On Board
09.10.2018
2
(Sharad Kumar Gupta) JUDGE
kishore
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. involving serious offences including POCSO Act.
Whether the accused has a criminal background or prior history affecting the bail decision.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Shashi Kumar Verma
State Of Chhattisgarh
Sharad Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
