High Court of Chhattisgarh, in criminal revision, upheld the conviction for insulting woman and voluntarily causing hurt, but reduced the sentence to the period already served as the incident occurred years ago.
Revision allowed in part; conviction maintained; sentence reduced to period already undergone.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CRR No. 469 of 2009
Sukhnandan S/o Biswa Yadav, age about 39 years, R/o Vill. Ghodari, P.S.Mahasamund, Tahsil & District – Mahasamund, CG.
---- Applicant
Versus
---- Respondent
For Applicant : Shri Keshav Dewangan, Advocate For State/Respondent : Smt. M. Aasha, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vimla Singh Kapoor
Order On Board
04 /12/2018
there is sufficient evidence to hold the accused/applicant guilty under Sections 294 and 325 IPC. The Court below has been fully justified in passing the order impugned. Conviction of the accused/applicant is thus maintained.
Sd/-
(Vimla Singh Kapoor)
Judge
Jyotishi/Pawan
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the conviction under Sections 294 and 325 IPC should be maintained.
Whether the sentence should be reduced to the period already undergone by the applicant.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sukhnandan S/o Biswa Yadav
The State of Chhattisgarh
Vimla Singh Kapoor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
