In a revision petition under Criminal Procedure Code, the High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the petition in part. While upholding the conviction for cheating, the Court reduced the sentence to the period already undergone by the applicant in jail.
Revision allowed in part; sentence reduced to the period already undergone by the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CRR No. 502 of 2004
Rohit S/o Bisahu Ram Patel, aged about 52 years, R/o Village Jevra, P.S.O.P. Jevra Sirsa, District Durg, CG.
| Versus | ---- Applicant |
|---|---|
| • The State of Chhattisgarh through Durg, CG. |
S.H.O. Of P.S. Phulgaon, District ---- Respondent |
| For Applicant : |
Shri Vipin Tiwari, Advocate |
| For State/Respondent : |
Smt. M. Aasha, Panel Lawyer |
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vimla Singh Kapoor
Order On Board
03 /12/2018
sentence to the period already undergone by him. Order accordingly.
modification in the judgment impugned as above.
Sd/-
(Vimla Singh Kapoor)
Judge
Jyotishi/Pawan
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the sentence imposed should be reduced given the time elapsed and period already undergone in jail.
Whether there is sufficient evidence to convict the applicant for cheating.
Rohit
The State of Chhattisgarh through Durg
Vimla Singh Kapoor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
