Disposed

Jauhari Singh Thakur v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC13 Sept 2018WPCR/28/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Chhattisgarh directed the respondent authorities to consider the petitioners application for remission within 60 days, noting that a similarly situated co-accused had already been granted remission, without commenting on the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

The respondent authorities were directed to consider the petitioners application for remission within 60 days.

Jauhari Singh Thakur Vs State Of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2018)

¶1

-1-

¶2

NAFR

¶3

H IGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

WPCR No. 28 of 2018

¶5

Jauhari Singh Thakur S/o Shri Haldhar Singh Thakur Aged About 52 Years R/o Village Basani, Police Station Kunda, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. Present Address Amaraiyya Chowk, Chingarajpara, Police Station Sarkanda, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., Chhattisgarh

¶6

---- Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Home Jail Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur Chhattisgarh., Chhattisgarh

¶9

The Director General, Prisons And Correctional Services Chhattisgarh, Head Quarter Prisons And Correctional Services Chhattisgarh, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶10

The Inspector General, Prisons And Correctional Services Chhattisgarh, Head Quarter Prisons And Correctional Services Chhattisgarh, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶11

The Jail Superintendent, Central Jail, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶12

The District Magistrate Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶13

---- Respondents

¶14

For Petitioner : Shri Rishi Rahul Soni, Advocate For State : Shri Ashish Shukla, Dy.A.G.

¶15

S.B. : Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava

Order On Board

13/09/2018

Heard.

At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the coaccused similarly situated in the same case has been granted benefit of remission by the respondent- authority.

¶20

Respondents have not taken any decision on petitioner's application.

¶21

-2-

¶22

However, in the return, relief claimed by the petitioner has been denied.

¶23

Without commenting on merits of the case, considering the submission that a co-accused of the same case has been granted benefit of remission, respondents may consider and take decision on petitioner's application for remission within a period of 60 days, on its own merits and in accordance with law.

¶24

The petition is accordingly disposed off.

¶25

It is made clear that this Court has not commented upon merits of the case and it would be open for the authority to take decision in the matter.

¶26

Sd/-/-/-----/-/---

¶27

(Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge

¶28

Praveen

Jauhari Singh Thakur v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jauhari Singh Thakur v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Indu Singh Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Jamuna Prasad Jaiswal Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Resham Lal @ Chikhliha Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ram Bihari Agrawal Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Manjul Dixit Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ashok Agrawal Vs State of Chhattisgarh