The Chhattisgarh High Court condoned the delay in filing a petition under Section 378(3) of the Cr.P.C. and granted leave of appeal, ordering the registration of the appeal as a regular acquittal appeal and issuing notice to the respondent.
Leave to appeal granted; case to be registered as regular acquittal appeal; notice issued to respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR ORDER SHEET
CRMP No. 1648 of 2017
State Of Chhattisgarh Versus Manoj Kumar Nag
| 20.02.2018 | Shri Anil Pillai, Dy. Advocate General for the State/petitioner. Heard on I.A. No. 01/2017, an application for condonation of delay in filing this petition. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Delay in filing this petition is condoned. The present petition has been filed under Section 378(3) of the Cr.P.C. seeking leave to appeal. The petition is allowed. The leave as prayed for is granted. Office is directed to register the case as a regular acquittal appeal. Also heard on admission. |
|---|---|
| Admit. Issue notice to the respondent on payment of P.F. as per Rules. Notice be made returnable in twelve weeks. |
|
| List the matter for final hearing in its due course. | |
| Sd/- Sd/- |
|
| (Pritinker Diwaker) (Sanjay Agrawal) JUDGE JUDGE |
Yogesh/Nikita
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave to appeal under Section 378(3) of the Cr.P.C. may be granted after condonation of delay.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
State Of Chhattisgarh
Manoj Kumar Nag
Pritinker Diwaker
Sanjay Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
