M/s Ranglani Construction Company v. State Of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court permitted the appellant to file a detailed representation before Respondent No.2 directly, instead of the initially intended Respondent No.4. The court directed Respondent No.2 to decide within four weeks and expressly stated the court did not adjudicate on merits.
What did the court decide?
Appellant permitted to file representation before Respondent No.2 within two weeks; Respondent No.2 to decide within four weeks.