This appeal against a rape conviction and sentence was dismissed. The High Court of Chhattisgarh held that the trial court correctly concluded the appellant was guilty based on the prosecution evidence and found no error in the impugned judgment.
Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence upheld.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRA No. 917 of 2008
---- Appellant Versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Thana Prabhari – Ramanujnagar, ---- Respondent
For Appellant : Shri N.K. Mehta, Advocate. For Respondent/State: Shri Anant Bajpai, Panel Lawyer.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant Judgment on Board
05/12/2018
2
pleaded innocence and false implication. One witness was examined in defence.
Sd/-
(Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge
Aadil
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should set aside the conviction and sentence imposed by the Sessions Court for rape.
Whether the prosecution evidence was reliable and trustworthy to sustain the conviction.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dhaniram S/o Jaimangal Rajwar
State Of Chhattisgarh
Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
