The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the appeal filed by Sukhna S/o Bhoura Nagesiya against a conviction and sentence by the First Additional Sessions Judge, Ambikapur, for offences under Sections 450, 397, and 394 of the IPC.
Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence of the appellant upheld.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRA No. 530 of 2013
---- Respondent
For Appellant : Smt. Meera Jaiswal, Advocate. For Respondent/State: Shri Vijay Bahadur Singh, Panel Lawyer.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant Judgment on Board
05/12/2018
2
3
the record of the trial Court and after due consideration, I am of this opinion that the trial Court has not committed any error in coming to the conclusion to hold the appellant guilty for the offence as aforementioned. Therefore, the appeal is without any substance, hence, the same is hereby dismissed accordingly.
(Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge
Aadil
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the conviction and sentence of the appellant under Section 450, 397, and 394 of the IPC should be set aside on appeal.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Sukhna S/o Bhoura Nagesiya
State Of Chhattisgarh
Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
