The Chhattisgarh High Court observed that the petitioner complied with the previous order by concluding a review departmental enquiry due to non-entitlement for promotion. The Court noted non-malafide delay and disposed of the petition, directing the petitioner to approach the court afresh if aggrieved by the denial of promotion.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CONT No. 209 of 2018
---- Petitioner
Versus
3. R. Prasanna, Special Secretary, Social Welfare Department/Sports/Youth (Independent Charge) Mantralaya New Raipur, Police Station Rakhi, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh
---- Respondent
For Petitioner Mr. Prateek Sharma, Advocate For Respondents Mr. Shashank Thakur, Advocate
Order On Board By
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra
5/12/2018
2
with by convening a review DPC and thereafter, the order -Annexure R/3 has been passed assigning reasons as to why the petitioner was found not entitled for promotion to the post of Joint Director, Health Services, Chhattisgarh.
(Prashant Kumar Mishra)
Judge
Shyna
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner has complied with the Court order regarding the pending departmental enquiry and denial of promotion.
Dr. R. N. Netam
Subrat Sahoo
Ranu Sahu
R. Prasanna
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
