Santosh Kumar v. Baratu
Case brief
What is this about?
CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCC No. 892 of 2017 …
What did the court decide?
Order on Board is restored to its original number which pays Rs 1000 to library fund
CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCC No. 892 of 2017 …
Order on Board is restored to its original number which pays Rs 1000 to library fund
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCC No. 892 of 2017
---- Petitioner
Versus
6. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh
---- Respondent
For Petitioner Mr. Sachin Nidhi, Advocate For Respondents/State Mr. Shashank Thakur, Government Advocate
Order On Board By
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra
4/12/2018
2
Sd/Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra)
Shyna
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the application for restoration of a dismissed filing Although No.
Santosh Kumar S/o Motilal Satnami
Baratu S/o Late Motilal Satnami
Surendra Kumar S/o Late Motilal Satnami
Satyendra Kumar S/o Late Panchram Satnami
Yugal Kishore S/o Late Panchram Satnami
Motilal Satnami Dead During Pendency Of Suit In Trial Court S/o Dev Singh Satnami
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court