The High Court in a contempt case directed respondent authorities to ensure compliance with an order of 19.09.2017 in W.P.(C) No.233/2017 before finally disposing of the case.
Contempt case disposed of after directing respondent authorities to ensure compliance with the order dated 19.09.2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
C ontempt Case (C) No. 201 of 2018
All petitioners are R/o Gandhiganj, Sawariya Building, Raigarh, Tahsil & District Raigarh (C.G.)
---- Petitioners
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioners:
Mr. Sourabh Sharma, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
13/03 /2018
(1) After hearing learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, I deem it appropriate to give one more opportunity to the respondent authorities to ensure the compliance of this Court’s order dated 19.09.2017 passed in W.P.(C) No.233/2017.
(2) Counsel for the petitioner may also make additional representation to the respondent authorities and, in turn, authority
2
concerned shall ensure the compliance of this Court’s order dated 19.09.2017 in its letter and spirit.
(3) With the aforesaid direction, the contempt case stands finally disposed of.
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
D/-
Hanuman Agrawal
Vinod Kumar Pandey
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
