The High Court allowed the petition allowing a peon to continue in his original regular post after being found ineligible for the promoted post of Lab. Assistant, making an interim order absolute.
Petitioner entitled to continue on post of peon; interim order of 31-08-2006 made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Writ Petition (S) No. 4682 of 2006
Virendra Pandey, Aged about 31 years, S/o Jay Mangal Pandey, R/o Mayapur, Shastri Ward No.27, In front of Shiv Mandir, Ambikapur District Surguja (Chhattisgarh).
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate. For State/respondents : Mr. Avinash Singh, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
12/03/18
2
of the petitioner has been dispensed with from the post of Lab. Assistant, he is entitled to continue on the regular post of peon.
Sd/(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
Kvr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an employee holding a regular post of peon is entitled to continue in that post after being found ineligible for a higher post of Lab. Assistant to which they were appointed.
Virendra Pandey
State of Chhattisgarh
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
