The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of a writ petition regarding the non-implementation of a transfer order, directing the State to comply or cancel the order.
Direction to the transferring authority to either cancel, vary, modify, or keep the transfer order in abeyance, or relieve the petitioner accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 1679 of 2017
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner Shri Uttam Pandey, Advocate For Respondent-State Shri S. P. Kale, Dy. AG
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra
Order On Board
11/04/2017
Sd/-
JUDGE
PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
Nirala
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be relieved pending implementation of a transfer order or if the State must cancel/vary it.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ms. Manisha Agrawal Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and OthersRelied on¶18
Ms. Manisha Agrawal Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others, 2015(4) C.G.L.J.182
T. L. Dongare
State Of Chhattisgarh
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
