Disposed

Smt. Mamta Tirkey v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC11 Apr 2017WPS/1676/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition concerning unpaid salary. It directed the Zila Panchayat, Raipur to decide a representation by the petitioner within 15 days, assessing her joining and service, issuing no opinion on the merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Zila Panchayat, Raipur to decide the petitioner's representation on her joining and service within 2 months if received within 15 days.

Smt. Mamta Tirkey Vs State Of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2017)

¶1

NAFR

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶3

WPS No. 1676 of 2017

¶4

Smt. Mamta Tirkey W/o. Shri Manoj Kumar Bhagat, Aged About 32 Years, R/o C-34, Lok Manya Parisar, Goal Chowk, Rohani Puram, Raipur, Civil And Revenue District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

¶5

---- Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, New Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

¶8

The Collector, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶9

Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

¶10

Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Janjgir Champa (Chhattisgarh)

¶11

---- Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner Shri Dharmesh Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent-State Shri Y. S. Thakur, Addl. AG

¶13

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra

¶14

Order On Board

¶15

11/04/2017

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in compliance to the order passed on 25.05.2016, the petitioner has

¶17

already jointed at the transferred place i.e. at Jila Panchayat, Raipur on 01.06.2016, yet salary has not been paid to the petitioner.

¶18

Considering the fact that the issue brought before this Court only pertains to payment of salary, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that if the petitioner prefers a representation within 15 days from today, the Jila Panchayat, Raipur shall decide the representation at the earliest, preferably within a period of 2 months thereafter. The Jila Panchayat shall consider as to whether the petitioner's joining was in accordance with law and has worked on the post before passing a speaking order on merits.

¶19

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall decide the matter, on its own merits, strictly in accordance with law, without treating any observation made in this order, as opinion on the merits of the case.

¶20

Sd/-

¶21

JUDGE

¶22

PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA

¶23

Nirala

Smt. Mamta Tirkey v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Mamta Tirkey v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tulsi Yadav Vs Secl and Anr.

Kuleshwar Joshi Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Rupesh Kumar Dewangan Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Arif Husain Siddiqui Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

T. L. Dongare Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Umashankar Shukla Vs State Of Chhattisgarh