This court disposed of a writ petition by directing the respondents to consider the petitioners' representations in light of a Supreme Court judgment before passing a speaking order within 60 days.
Directing respondents to consider petitioners' representations in light of Supreme Court judgment and pass a speaking order within 60 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 148 of 2017
---- Petitioners
Versus
2
---- Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------For Petitioners : Mr.Sourabh Sharma, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Mr.Rajkumar Gupta, Advocate For Respondents No.2 to 10 : Mr.Gary Mukhopadhyay, Dy.G.A.
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy
Order on Board
13/1/2017
Sd/-
B/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present writ petition, seeking similar relief to WP(S) No.6430 of 2016, should be disposed of by directing respondents to consider representations in light of Supreme Court judgment.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Punjab & Ors. Vs. Jagjit Singh & Ors.Explained¶30
State of Punjab & Ors. Vs. Jagjit Singh & Ors.
WP(S) No.6430 of 2016Referred¶28
WP(S) No.6430 of 2016
Dhannuram Patel and 6 others
Union Of India
State Of Chhattisgarh
Directorate, School Education
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
