Disposed
Sanjay Kumar Gupta v. Vikas Kumar
Chhattisgarh HCCRMP/363/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Order Sheet…
What the court decided
AI extract
CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Order Sheet…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Order Sheet
Criminal Misc. Petition No. 363 of 2016
… Petitioners
Versus
Vikas Kumar, S/o Chandicharan, aged about 34 years, Proprietor M/s Ukta Construction, Nehru Nagar, Bilaspur, R/o Sharad Palace Geetanjali Vihar, Nehru Nagar, Tahsil & District Bilaspur (C.G.)
… Respondent
| 12/01/2017 | Mr. Akhil Mishra, Advocate, for the Petitioners. |
|---|---|
| Sharad | Mr. Malay Shrivastava, Advocate, for the Respondent. As arguable points have been raised by the Counsel for the Petitioner and also the fact that the leave to appeal has already been granted in other connected matters, the present Criminal Misc. Petition is also allowed. Registry is directed to register the present petition as a regular Acquittal Appeal. Heard on Acquittal Appeal. The Acquittal Appeal is admitted for hearing. Since Shri Malay Shrivastava, Advocate, enters appearance on behalf of the Respondent and takes notice, issuance of notice to the Respondent stands dispensed with. Registry has pointed out certain defaults in the documents filed by the Petitioner. Counsel for the Petitioner undertakes for removing the defaults within a further period of four weeks. List along with Acquittal Appeal No. 182 of 2015. Meanwhile, record of the Court below be called. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE |
Sanjay Kumar Gupta
Omprakash Gupta
Vikas Kumar
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court