Disposed

Vinod Kumar Sinha v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC7 Apr 2017WPS/1366/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order addresses a grievance regarding non-payment of salary to a manager of a cooperative society. The court directed the respondent to consider a representation for salary payment within six months if filed within three weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondent to consider and decide the petitioner's representation regarding salary payment by a speaking order within six months.

Vinod Kumar Sinha Vs State Of Chhattisgarh — Service and Employment | Chhattisgarh HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

WPS No. 1366 of 2017

¶5

Vinod Kumar Sinha S/o Late Rameswar Prasad Sinha, Aged About 58 Years, Manager, Priyadarshini Subidha Swa- Sewa Kendra, Transport Nagar, Korba And R/o Champa Niwas, Madhuban Road, P. S. Civil Line P S, Tehsil And Dist. Bilaspur 495001 State Chhattisgarh.

¶6

---- Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary To The Government, Department Of Co-Operation, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

¶9

Registrar Of Co-operative Societies, State Of Chhattisgarh, Indravati Bhawan, Raipur, Tehsil And Dist. Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

¶10

Managing Director, Chhattisgarh Rajya Sahakari Upavokta Sangh Mydt. At. Jal Vihar Colony, In Front Of Sagar Kirana Bhandar, Shyam Nagar, Ravigram, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶11

---- Respondent

¶12

For Petitioner Mt. Yatindra Nath Mishra, Advocate For Respondent/State Ms.Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer

¶13

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra

¶14

Order On Board

¶15

7/4/2017

¶16

Heard.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was earlier working as Manager in the Bilaspur Branch of Chhatisgarh Rajya Sahakari Upavokta Sangh Maryadit.

¶18

¶19

On 21.8.2012, he was transferred to Korba, where he joined on 27.8.2012. He was paid salary at Korba till March 2014, however, thereafter, Priyadarshini Suvidha Swa Seva Kendra, Korba, has stopped functioning and the petitioner along with 8 other employees have not been paid salary since then. It is also submitted that the petitioners have never been discharged from service nor any enquiry is pending, therefore, nonpayment of salary is in violation of constitutional right under Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

¶20

Considering the nature of grievance raised by the petitioner, ends of justice would be served, if the writ petition is disposed of with direction that in the event the petitioner prefers a representation for payment of salary before respondent No.3 i.e. Manager, Chhattisgarh Rajya Sahakari Upavokta Sangh Maryadit, Raipur, within a period of 03 weeks from today, the said respondent shall consider and decide the representation by a speaking order, at the earliest, preferably within a period of 06 months from the date of submission of representation.

¶21

It is ordered accordingly. In the event, the grievance of the petitioner remains unredressed, the petitioner would be at liberty to move afresh before this Court.

¶22

Sd/-

¶23

(Prashant Kumar Mishra)

¶24

Shyna

Vinod Kumar Sinha v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinod Kumar Sinha v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hemsagar Yadav Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Nitin Singh Vs Janlaxmi Financial Services Limited

Dwarika Dhish Tiwari Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Smt Poornima Pushpakar Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Afsana Praveen Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Lalki Nagesiya Vs Union Of India